October 30, 2006

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Friday that it has granted a writ of certiorari for Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp to allow for additional comment on foreign patent damages. In July of 2005, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision that AT&T could pursue royalties from Microsoft from Microsoft’s overseas manufacture and sale of infringing software. At issue were the master versions of the Microsoft Windows® product that Microsoft would ship overseas and allow specific computer manufacturers to replicate the software and install it on computers being assembled and sold overseas. The software contained specific speech codecs that were held to be infringing of AT&T reissue patent no. 32,580. The Federal Circuit affirmed the decision that Microsoft was liable to AT&T under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f), holding that shipping software overseas for copying purposes counts as “supplying” under the statute. Microsoft’s petition for a writ of certiorari contained two issues: “(1) Whether digital software code – an intangible sequence of “1’s” and “0’s” – may be considered a “component[] of a patented invention” within the meaning of Section 271(f)(1); and, if so, (2) Whether copies of such a “component[]” made in a foreign country are “supplie[d] … from the United States.” According to the Washington Post article (link below), this “is one of the most important patent cases that will come before the court this year and could determine the reach of U.S. patents overseas.”

U.S. Supreme Court Announcement: LINK
Washington Post News Article: LINK
Microsoft v. AT&T (Federal Circuit Decision): LINK


Post a Comment

WIPO Press Releases

WIPO General News

Patent References

Click HERE to search issued U.S. Patents

Click HERE to search published U.S. Patent Applications

Click HERE to browse the MPEP (E8r6 in HTML and PDF, and E8r7 in PDF)

Click HERE to search patent assignments recorded with the USPTO

Click HERE to search Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (rev. 7/1/08)

Click HERE to browse Title 35 of the U.S. Code

Click HERE to view current USPTO fees


Copyright 2006-2010, Mark Reichel. The Daily Dose of IP is my personal website, and I am not providing any legal advice or financial analysis. Any views expressed herein should not be viewed as being the views of my employer, Ice Miller LLP. Any comments submitted to this blog will not be held in confidence and will not be considered as establishing an attorney-client relationship. Information submitted to this blog should be considered as being public information, and the submitter takes full responsibility for any consequences of any information submitted. No claims, promises, or guarantees are made or available regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this blog or otherwise available by searching from or linking away from this blog.

EPO Updates

Trademark References

Click HERE to search issued and pending U.S. Trademarks

Click HERE to search TTAB proceedings (via TTABVUE)

Click HERE to search trademark assignments recorded with the USPTO

The DDIP Author

Mark Reichel
Reichel IP LLC

I am a patent attorney with Reichel IP LLC, where I concentrate my practice on patent drafting and prosecution, trademarks, and general intellectual property matters. I currently focus on the preparation and prosecution of medical device and other life sciences patent applications, and being actively involved in a number of local not-for-profit organizations.

Click HERE to view my full professional bio at Reichel IP LLC.


Click HERE to join the e-mail list for my blog

Click HERE to provide feedback on the DDIP blog

Fellow Blogs/Bloggers

AwakenIP (Kuester)
Counterfeit Chic (Scafidi)
I/P Updates (Heinze)
Internet Cases (Brown)
Likelihood of Confusion (Coleman)
Patent Baristas (Albainy-Jenei)
Patent Docs (Zuhn et al.)
Patently-O (Crouch)
The 271 Patent Blog (Zura)
The Ice Loop (Ice Miller LLP)
The Indiana Law Blog (Oddi)
The Invent Blog (Nipper)
The Patent Prospector (Odom)
The TTABlog (Welch)