December 28, 2006

The USPTO recently announced its statistics pertaining to quality and production, hiring and training, electronic filing and processing, telework, and international relations and enforcement for fiscal year 2006. According to the USPTO, patent examiners completed 332,000 patent applications in FY2006, with a 54% allowance rate and the lowest patent allowance error rate (3.5%) in over twenty years. Final action was taken in over 378,000 trademark applications, achieving a record-low 3.6% error rate. Over 1,200 patent examiners were hired, with the goal of hiring 1,000 new examiners each year for the next five years. In addition, 87 trademark examining attorneys were hired, resulting in a total of over 400 trademark attorneys at the USPTO (the most ever). Use of the Electronic Filing System-Web (EFS-Web) jumped from 1.5% per month of total patent filings to 33% of total patent filings, and 94% of all trademark applications were filed electronically (compared with 88% in FY2005). Additional statistics, including information on examiner work outside of the office and efforts to stop intellectual property piracy, are available at the USPTO link below.

USPTO Press Release: LINK
USPTO's FY 2006 Performance and Accountability Report: LINK


Post a Comment

WIPO Press Releases

WIPO General News

Patent References

Click HERE to search issued U.S. Patents

Click HERE to search published U.S. Patent Applications

Click HERE to browse the MPEP (E8r6 in HTML and PDF, and E8r7 in PDF)

Click HERE to search patent assignments recorded with the USPTO

Click HERE to search Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (rev. 7/1/08)

Click HERE to browse Title 35 of the U.S. Code

Click HERE to view current USPTO fees


Copyright 2006-2010, Mark Reichel. The Daily Dose of IP is my personal website, and I am not providing any legal advice or financial analysis. Any views expressed herein should not be viewed as being the views of my employer, Ice Miller LLP. Any comments submitted to this blog will not be held in confidence and will not be considered as establishing an attorney-client relationship. Information submitted to this blog should be considered as being public information, and the submitter takes full responsibility for any consequences of any information submitted. No claims, promises, or guarantees are made or available regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this blog or otherwise available by searching from or linking away from this blog.

EPO Updates

Trademark References

Click HERE to search issued and pending U.S. Trademarks

Click HERE to search TTAB proceedings (via TTABVUE)

Click HERE to search trademark assignments recorded with the USPTO

The DDIP Author

Mark Reichel
Reichel IP LLC

I am a patent attorney with Reichel IP LLC, where I concentrate my practice on patent drafting and prosecution, trademarks, and general intellectual property matters. I currently focus on the preparation and prosecution of medical device and other life sciences patent applications, and being actively involved in a number of local not-for-profit organizations.

Click HERE to view my full professional bio at Reichel IP LLC.


Click HERE to join the e-mail list for my blog

Click HERE to provide feedback on the DDIP blog

Fellow Blogs/Bloggers

AwakenIP (Kuester)
Counterfeit Chic (Scafidi)
I/P Updates (Heinze)
Internet Cases (Brown)
Likelihood of Confusion (Coleman)
Patent Baristas (Albainy-Jenei)
Patent Docs (Zuhn et al.)
Patently-O (Crouch)
The 271 Patent Blog (Zura)
The Ice Loop (Ice Miller LLP)
The Indiana Law Blog (Oddi)
The Invent Blog (Nipper)
The Patent Prospector (Odom)
The TTABlog (Welch)