May 17, 2007

As argued in her brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Denice Halicki contends that her trademarks to the original movie “Gone in 60 Seconds” and the “star” car of the movie (“Eleanor”) extend to the 2000 version of “Gone in 60 Seconds” and that Carroll Shelby and Unique Performance infringe her copyrights and trademarks. This appeal comes after the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles granted summary judgment against Halicki in 2005, and according to The Auto Channel article (link below), summary judgment was granted even though Halicki has maintained common law trademark rights for 33 years, and that she, and not Disney (the producer of the 2000 movie remake), maintained rights in the “Eleanor” mark via agreement with Disney. Shelby and Unique Performance, the defendants in the original suit, obtained summary judgment in their favor in part by arguing that Halicki lacked standing, and that Disney, and not Halicki, owned rights to the “Eleanor” trademark. Halicki currently runs a website (, link below) to sell related merchandise, and Shelby has teamed with Unique Performance to sell Shelby G.T. 500E replica vehicles on the unique performance website (link below). The Carroll Hall Shelby Trust owns U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,837,333 for “Eleanor” in IC 012 (US 019, 021, 023, 031, 035 and 044) for “VEHICLES, NAMELY, AUTOMOBILES, ENGINES FOR AUTOMOBILES, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR AUTOMOBILES.”

The Auto Channel Article: LINK Website: LINK
Unique Performance Website: LINK
U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 2,837,333: LINK


Post a Comment

WIPO Press Releases

WIPO General News

Patent References

Click HERE to search issued U.S. Patents

Click HERE to search published U.S. Patent Applications

Click HERE to browse the MPEP (E8r6 in HTML and PDF, and E8r7 in PDF)

Click HERE to search patent assignments recorded with the USPTO

Click HERE to search Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (rev. 7/1/08)

Click HERE to browse Title 35 of the U.S. Code

Click HERE to view current USPTO fees


Copyright 2006-2010, Mark Reichel. The Daily Dose of IP is my personal website, and I am not providing any legal advice or financial analysis. Any views expressed herein should not be viewed as being the views of my employer, Ice Miller LLP. Any comments submitted to this blog will not be held in confidence and will not be considered as establishing an attorney-client relationship. Information submitted to this blog should be considered as being public information, and the submitter takes full responsibility for any consequences of any information submitted. No claims, promises, or guarantees are made or available regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this blog or otherwise available by searching from or linking away from this blog.

EPO Updates

Trademark References

Click HERE to search issued and pending U.S. Trademarks

Click HERE to search TTAB proceedings (via TTABVUE)

Click HERE to search trademark assignments recorded with the USPTO

The DDIP Author

Mark Reichel
Reichel IP LLC

I am a patent attorney with Reichel IP LLC, where I concentrate my practice on patent drafting and prosecution, trademarks, and general intellectual property matters. I currently focus on the preparation and prosecution of medical device and other life sciences patent applications, and being actively involved in a number of local not-for-profit organizations.

Click HERE to view my full professional bio at Reichel IP LLC.


Click HERE to join the e-mail list for my blog

Click HERE to provide feedback on the DDIP blog

Fellow Blogs/Bloggers

AwakenIP (Kuester)
Counterfeit Chic (Scafidi)
I/P Updates (Heinze)
Internet Cases (Brown)
Likelihood of Confusion (Coleman)
Patent Baristas (Albainy-Jenei)
Patent Docs (Zuhn et al.)
Patently-O (Crouch)
The 271 Patent Blog (Zura)
The Ice Loop (Ice Miller LLP)
The Indiana Law Blog (Oddi)
The Invent Blog (Nipper)
The Patent Prospector (Odom)
The TTABlog (Welch)